H
Huevorch
New Member
Spanish
- Apr 20, 2013
- #1
Hello everybody in this forum. In the past week I have read a couple of articles where they use this term, to “harvest an animal”. For instance, one article read that “it is illegal to harvest white sharks in Australia”. What do they mean with “harvest”? Is it just keeping the animal alive, or they mean hunting and killing the animal? I appreciate everybody for their help.
cyberpedant
Senior Member
North Adams, MA
English USA, Northeast, NYC
- Apr 20, 2013
- #2
To my mind, "harvesting" always implies putting the "harvestee" into the human food chain.
sdgraham
Senior Member
Oregon, USA
USA English
- Apr 20, 2013
- #3
Welcome to the forum Huevich
"Harvest" is commonly used in the U.S., at least, to refer to the taking of fish and game.
See also Crop vs Harvest
Last edited:
JustKate
Senior Member
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
English - US
- Apr 20, 2013
- #4
I agree with SDG that harvest is certainly used with fish and game, but I wouldn't go so far as to say it's common. Government agencies and researchers use this term quite often, particularly when they need to talk about fairly large numbers (such as the "deer harvest" during the 2012 deer hunting season). But regular people in their regular conversation generally do not.
PaulQ
Senior Member
UK
English - England
- Apr 20, 2013
- #5
"Harvest" is a euphemism. It sounds as if the animal is a crop and crops are unfeeling and for food/other uses. By the use of "harvest", which has pleasant connotations, it is hoped that emotion will be removed from wholesale slaughter - it seems to work.
P
Parla
Member Emeritus
New York City
English - US
- Apr 20, 2013
- #6
It should be added that I've always seen the word used with the plural when referring to animals (as opposed to plants). I've never heard or read of harvesting a single deer, or oyster, or shark.
Loob
Senior Member
English UK
- Apr 20, 2013
- #7
Perhaps it's only me, but I find "harvest" decidedly unpleasant when used in relation to animals rather than crops.
As regards Huevorch's question about what it means - it means "kill".
JulianStuart
Senior Member
Sonoma County CA
English (UK then US)
- Apr 20, 2013
- #8
Loob said:
Perhaps it's only me, but I find "harvest" decidedly unpleasant when used in relation to animals rather than crops.
As regards Huevorch's question about what it means - it means "kill".
It's not only you, Loob. The images of a "combine harvester" and a "crop" of living animals - conjures as unpleasant an image as when someone says "an amount of people"
. I think in this case the euphemism is worse than the bald truth.
Last edited:
london calling
Senior Member
Salerno, Italy
UK English
- Apr 20, 2013
- #9
JulianStuart said:
I think in this case the euphemism is worse than the bald truth.
I must say I find it unpleasant too. However, I think we would normally speak of "culling": that is certainly what happens to the poor foxes who inhabit the woods my parent's place backs onto in London.
sdgraham
Senior Member
Oregon, USA
USA English
- Apr 20, 2013
- #10
Although the term might offend some folks, note that inference is that one is dealing with a renewable resource rather than annihilating it.
JulianStuart
Senior Member
Sonoma County CA
English (UK then US)
- Apr 20, 2013
- #11
Some additional context could be helpful. Googling "white shark harvest" images reveals that Great White Shark is also the name of a variety of marijuana plant which apparently yields bountiful harvests I think this is just coincidence....
You must log in or register to reply here.